"If every agency worked like B2B Better, I wouldn't have a problem. They just make it easy." – Corrina Oakham, Head of Digital Marketing, Cambridge Spark
"It was a no-brainer for me to rely on B2B Better's expertise and strategic acumen." – Marco Lorenzi, Head of Marketing, Simplestream
"We were able to recruit really interesting guests with very minimal effort on my part." – Ross Katz, Principal Data Science Lead, CorrDyn
"The feedback from the market and the industry has been phenomenal." – Ross Howard, Head of Marketing, Inbox Insight
"Jason is a real powerhouse — excellent at helping us manage logistics, the guests, and really driving results." – Faye Girvan, Marketing Director, Hypercube Consulting
← Blog

Why weird B2B brands are easier to remember than safe ones

Marketing Week's case for B2B weirdness has direct implications for how thought leadership podcasts should sound and feel.

Why weird B2B brands are easier to remember than safe ones

Marketing Week’s latest piece makes a straightforward argument: B2B brands that violate expectation stick in memory better than brands that play it safe. The mechanism isn’t comedy — it’s surprise. When something breaks the pattern you anticipated, your brain flags it as worth retaining. For B2B marketers running a podcast, this is worth sitting with.

Most B2B podcasts don’t do this. They confirm expectations at every turn: a polished intro, two professionals agreeing with each other for 40 minutes, a gentle outro. Entirely forgettable.

Safe podcasting is a category trap

When every show in your sector sounds the same — measured tone, safe guests, consensus conclusions — the category itself trains listeners to tune out. You’re not competing against a single rival show; you’re competing against the accumulated boredom of everything that came before you.

The Marketing Week argument applies directly here. Unexpected doesn’t mean unprofessional. It means doing something your audience didn’t predict: a format that shifts mid-episode, a guest who openly disagrees with the host, a topic your competitors would consider too risky to touch. These moments create what memory researchers call encoding specificity — the brain stores information that contrasts with its surroundings.

If your podcast sounds exactly like your competitors’ podcasts, the only differentiator left is distribution budget.

The distinction between weird and gimmicky

The Marketing Week piece is careful about this, and it matters for podcasting too. The goal isn’t weirdness for its own sake. The host at the family gathering isn’t performing surrealism — he’s expressing something genuine in an unexpected way. That’s the distinction.

B2B podcasters who chase novelty without genuine conviction produce shows that feel try-hard. The unexpectedness has to come from a real editorial point of view: a willingness to say something your industry hasn’t said, to disagree with a widely-held assumption, to structure a conversation differently because you actually believe the standard format serves the guest more than the listener.

Goalhanger — currently Britain’s fastest-growing private company according to this week’s Sunday Times list — built its catalogue on a simple but genuinely distinctive premise: take history seriously, tell it well, treat the audience as intelligent. That’s not gimmicky. It’s a clear editorial position executed consistently. The rest follows.

What this means for your show’s positioning

If you’re planning or auditing a B2B thought leadership podcast, run this test: describe your show in one sentence and then ask whether any of your three closest competitors could use exactly the same description. If yes, you don’t have a positioning — you have a format.

Specificity is the route to memorability. Not a show about supply chain strategy — a show that argues supply chain decisions are fundamentally financial decisions, and interviews CFOs accordingly. Not a show about HR leadership — a show that only talks to HR leaders who’ve made a call that cost them something professionally.

The constraint forces a point of view. The point of view produces surprise. The surprise creates memory.

The practical takeaway: before you record another episode, write down the one thing your show believes that most shows in your category would avoid saying. If you can’t write it down, your show doesn’t have it yet.